What changed in 2026 for head spa therapists, stylists and cosmetic practitioners, from new law and advertising guidance to ingredient limits, and the education that change now asks of us.
This edition looks back at 2026 from the cosmetic side of hair and scalp care. It is part of Four years in review, a retrospective series published on 30 September 2026. Trichozette is new, so this is not an archive of old issues but a single, considered account of the year, with sources listed at the end.
For head spa therapists, stylists, barbers and cosmetic practitioners, 2026 was a year in which the rules caught up with the work. Scotland passed a law on non-surgical procedures that reaches treatments some scalp clinics offer. The advertising regulator explained how hair-loss claims should be made. Ingredient limits changed in Great Britain and across the EU, which matters for anyone who retails products in Ireland as well as in Britain.
It was also a year in which clients' medicines began to show up at the basin. The evidence linking weight-loss medicines to shedding grew, and the cosmetic professional is often the first person to notice. That makes observation, record-keeping and referral more important than ever.
None of this is meant to alarm. Most of what changed rewards good practice that many members already follow. Read the articles, try the questions at the end, and bring your own experience of the year to the community.
The Trichollective editorial team
Regulation
The rulebook moved
Scotland legislated, England kept drafting, Ireland kept debating and the advertising regulator spoke plainly about hair loss. What 2026 changed for the cosmetic practitioner.
Photograph Ben Iwara / Unsplash
Words by the Trichollective editorial team
For years, the regulation of non-surgical cosmetic treatments in the UK and Ireland has been discussed more than it has been decided. In 2026, one nation decided, and the others moved closer. For anyone whose treatment menu has grown beyond cutting, colouring and cleansing, it was a year to pay attention.
Scotland passes its law
On 17 March 2026 the Scottish Parliament passed the Non-surgical Procedures and Functions of Medical Reviewers (Scotland) Bill. The treatments it covers include botulinum toxin, dermal fillers, laser treatments, chemical peels and microneedling. They will be banned for anyone under 18, and restricted to registered settings such as clinics registered with Healthcare Improvement Scotland, with a professional registered with the GMC, NMC, GDC or GPhC on site. The main requirements are expected to apply from September 2027.
Microneedling is the item to note. Some head spas and scalp clinics offer it as a scalp treatment. If you practise in Scotland and your menu includes anything that pierces the skin, now is the time to find out how the new framework applies to you, rather than in the summer of 2027.
Before the vote, in February, the National Hair & Beauty Federation set out the sector's position. It supported regulation that improves consumer safety but argued that standards should rest on demonstrated competence rather than professional background alone, and asked for portfolio routes, affordable supervision models, transitional support and consistency across the UK.
England and Ireland
England's licensing scheme remained in development during 2026. The approach set out by government, as summarised by the NHBF, is tiered: the highest-risk procedures restricted to qualified healthcare professionals in settings registered with the Care Quality Commission, and lower-risk procedures under local authority licensing, with the highest-risk treatments prioritised first. In Ireland, the Irish College of Aesthetic Medicine warned in February that the law does not define who is appropriately trained to inject dermal fillers, and in September renewed its call for safeguards.
“
In 2026, one nation decided, and the others moved closer.
What you may say about hair loss
On 9 July the ASA and CAP published guidance on advertising hair-loss products and services. The points most relevant to the cosmetic chair are these.
Claims to prevent, cure or reverse hair loss are medicinal and need a marketing authorisation.
Claims such as reduces hair loss or strengthens hair may be acceptable with robust evidence.
Ads should not blur different types of hair loss, such as alopecia areata, telogen effluvium and androgenetic alopecia.
Before-and-after images must show genuine, typical outcomes.
Testimonials do not replace clinical evidence.
Can a salon advertise a scalp treatment by saying it treats telogen effluvium?
Sources
Every fact in this edition, and where it came from.
Create a free Trichollective account to read every edition of Trichozette in full, including the archive from 2023 to 2026, with a new edition each month.
05PhotographThe cosmetic professional sees the scalp more often than anyone else. In 2026 that made careful observation, and a good referral route, part of the job.
06EducationHead spa, shedding and where your role ends
07Put it into practiceYour 2026 checks
Free for every professional
Create a free account and read every edition in full.
Free, with a directory listing that stays free for as long as you like.
Read every edition of Trichozette in full, including the archive from 2023 to 2026
A basic directory listing that stays free for as long as you like: name, discipline, town and specialism
Your full profile free for 90 days: photo, services, website and enquiries sent straight to you