Light panels, scopes and scanners now sit in many treatment rooms. This edition looks at what the research supports, where it runs out, and how to talk about equipment without overpromising.
Few questions come up in our conversations as often as this one: is it worth buying? A supplier has shown you a device, the demonstration was persuasive, and the finance terms look manageable. What you want is someone who will tell you plainly what the equipment can and cannot do.
That is the spirit of this edition. We have tried to set out the evidence as it stands, without enthusiasm and without cynicism. Some technologies have a reasonable body of research behind them for specific uses. Others have very little. Almost all of them are described, somewhere, in language that goes further than the research does.
You will find a careful look at light-based treatments, including why ultraviolet belongs under medical oversight. There is a practical guide to scopes and trichoscopy, a set of questions to put to any supplier, and some thoughts on describing devices to clients in words you can stand behind.
None of this is an argument against technology. A good scope can change a consultation, and a well-chosen device can have a sensible place in a treatment plan. The aim is simply that every purchase, and every promise, should rest on something solid.
The Trichollective editorial team
Evidence
What light can and cannot do
Low-level light is one of the most researched devices in hair care, and one of the most oversold. Ultraviolet is a different matter altogether.
Photograph Mathilde Langevin / Unsplash
Words by the Trichollective editorial team
Walk around any beauty trade show and you will see red light glowing from helmets, caps, hoods and handheld wands. The category goes by several names: low-level light therapy, low-level laser therapy, photobiomodulation, or simply LED. The names matter less than the questions underneath them. What is the device meant to do, for whom, and how do we know?
The research, in outline
Low-level light has been studied mainly in pattern hair loss. A number of trials have reported modest changes in hair counts or density over several months of regular use. The research also has well-known limits. Many studies are small or short, devices and settings vary widely, and some trials are funded by the companies selling the equipment. Researchers are still discussing how the light might act on the follicle, and which wavelengths, doses and schedules matter.
A fair summary, then, is that low-level light may help some people with some types of hair loss, and that results are variable and depend on consistent use. That is a long way from the language of regrowth and guarantees that often surrounds it.
“
Low-level light may help some people with some types of hair loss. That is a long way from a guarantee.
What that means in the treatment room
Establish the likely cause of the hair loss first. Light will not address thyroid disease, iron deficiency, scarring conditions or medication effects, and some of those need a doctor.
Set expectations in writing. Say that response varies, that any change is usually gradual, and that stopping treatment may mean losing what was gained.
Photograph and measure at baseline and at agreed intervals, under the same lighting and from the same angles, so that you and the client can judge progress honestly.
Follow the manufacturer's instructions on eye protection, contraindications and photosensitising medication, and record that you have checked.
Ultraviolet is not the same thing
Ultraviolet light is used in dermatology, under medical supervision, for certain inflammatory skin conditions, which can include some that affect the scalp. It is also a known cause of sunburn, skin ageing and skin cancer. The dose that helps one person can harm another, particularly someone with fair skin, a history of skin cancer, or medication that makes the skin more sensitive to light.
For that reason, ultraviolet treatment of the scalp is not something to offer on the strength of a supplier's training day. It needs a clear clinical reason, proper training, and medical oversight wherever a condition is being treated. If a device on your shortlist emits ultraviolet, ask exactly what it is for, who should be operating it, and what your insurer says.
Light-based devices can earn a place in a considered practice. They earn it through careful case selection, honest conversation and good records, not through the brochure.
Free with an account
There are 8 more features in this edition.
Create a free Trichollective account to read every edition of Trichozette in full, including the archive from 2023 to 2026, with a new edition each month.
05PhotographA device is only as useful as the assessment that comes before it. Most of the value in scalp work still sits in looking carefully and asking good questions.
06AssessmentSeeing the scalp: scopes and trichoscopy
07Buying wellHow to read a supplier's claims
08ToolsQuestions to ask before you buy
09ConversationDescribing devices to clients honestly
10At a glanceDevices, in plain terms
Free for every professional
Create a free account and read every edition in full.
Free, with a directory listing that stays free for as long as you like.
Read every edition of Trichozette in full, including the archive from 2023 to 2026
A basic directory listing that stays free for as long as you like: name, discipline, town and specialism
Your full profile free for 90 days: photo, services, website and enquiries sent straight to you